ETHC 445 Week 4 Complete DeVry
Just Click on Below Link To Download This Course:
ETHC 445 Week 4 Discussions
WEEK 4: DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS
11 unread reply.1515 replies.
Each week, you may use the threads to draft your current work, interact with your peers, document the progress you have made as a result of your team collaborations, and address course content using the topics below. Please refer to the threaded discussion rubric, so that you are in full compliance.
Increasing food supplies are necessary to sustain growing populations around the world and their appetites for great food, quality products, and continuous availability.
A great deal of expensive research is invested in developing technologies to deliver productive agriculture. Horticultural efforts to breed hybrid crops are seen as far back as history can observe, and there have been efforts to domesticate improved animals, as well. Gene splitting was a 1990s technology to improve the health and productivity of farm crops. With the 21st century have come genetically modified foods (GMF) through the use of nanotechnology to cause changes at the genetic and even molecular levels. These are very expensive technologies, and many new products have been patented and otherwise protected as proprietary products of intellectual property.
Drive out to the country during growing season, and you will see signs identifying that the crop has been grown with a protected seed that cannot be used to produce retained seed for planting in the next growing season.
In terms of this week’s TCOs, what ethical issues are raised by this legal process of patent protection, and how do we see the primary schools of ethics used in these proprietary measures? What, in this deontological week and in our learning to date, informs our understanding of this situation, and what should be done about it?
WEEK 4: KANT AND THE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE
Kant’s famous First Formulation of the Categorical Imperative reads:
“Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.” Kant taught morality as a matter of following maxims of living that reflect absolute laws. “Universal” is a term that allows for no exceptions, and what is universal applies always and everywhere. Lying, for any reason, is universally wrong.
Be sure to listen to Kant’s audio lecture before posting this week!
So, consider the famous case of the Crazed Murderer. In your town the Crazed Murderer comes to your door looking for your friend and wanting to kill him. You know that your friend went home to hide. What do you tell the murderer? When he leaves and runs up the street to your friend’s house, what do you do?
ETHC 445 Week 4 ACADEMIC SCHOLARSHIP
Using academic scholarly research, find an article that addresses an ethical dilemma from the past five years and annotate it thoroughly. What are the key points to the article? Summarize the dilemma. What are the key terms of the article? What conflicts or controversies does it raise? Where can you offer analysis or an original point of view? Once you have a handle on the article and your reaction to the issues it raises, use it as a foundation to
- Create your own 2-4 paragraph “dilemma.”
- Apply Kant’s Categorical Imperative to the problem you invent.
- Apply any other method you have encountered in lecture material and the readings.
- State which method you prefer and why.
- Work with a partner collaboratively to share and divide this work for optimal results.
Your paper should be 3 pages. You MUST provide the source of the foundation dilemma, and thus this paper will require 1 reference using at least 1 correct in-text citation (indicating quoted or paraphrased material from the article and where to locate it). Use APA format in citing the source. Refer to course resources for details and help in achieving APA style.
Work with a partner to share this assignment collaboratively and create a combined oral presentation. Consider creating a youtube video, MP3 podcast (if you have those skills) or a video presentation.
|This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
Writer provides a solid example of academic scholarship, related to a specific real-world problem. The source is written by a professional ethicist, scholar, appears in a peer-reviewed journal, and has ample references of its own.
|This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation Quality
The writer annotates the source fully, considering the main points, key terms used (with in-text citation of pages); s/he analyzes content for implications, consequences, and subtle problems and controversies. S/he establishes points of agreement/disagreement and gives cause. S/he locates 1 or 2 pithy quotations that will serve as evidence in his/her analysis. Course material and team input is leveraged powerfully.
|This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Mechanics, Style, Format, Quality of Thought
Grammar refers to correct Standard American Usage, e.g., subject/verb agreement and use of correct parts of speech. Mechanics refers to correct idiomatic usage, e.g., capitalized proper nouns, word choice, and word order. Style (5 pts) refers to dynamic writing, avoiding passive constructions, writing that shows, describes, and compels the reader’s interest. Evident care has been taken in composing; there are few errors, and they do not significantly interfere with meaning. APA format has been followed scrupulously.
|This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVisual Presentation||
|This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOral Narration||
|Total Points: 150.0|