HRM 320 DeVry Entire Course

Downloading is very simple, you can download this Course here:

http://wiseamerican.us/product/hrm-320-devry-entire-course/

Or

Contact us at:

SUPPORT@WISEAMERICAN.US

HRM 320 DeVry Entire Course

HRM320

HRM 320 DeVry Entire Course

 

HRM 320 DeVry Week 1 Discussion 1

Lofty Lawns (graded)

(TCO 1) Larry Land establishes a landscaping business under the name “Lofty Lawns.” The business handles lawn care and seasonal flowers for apartment complexes, condominium associations, and homeowner associations. Larry wants to keep labor costs, legal liability, and administrative paperwork to a minimum. When he hires groundskeepers, he requires them to sign an “independent contractor” agreement that acknowledges they are independent contractors, not employees. He does not require that they be incorporated or have experience. He provides a free 1-day training seminar on lawn care “the lofty lawn way” to all his workers. He requires them to buy their own white truck and to buy from him (at cost) the trim package that says “Lofty Lawns” on the side and back of the truck. He requires them to maintain their own vehicle liability insurance (and show proof of insurance), and to pay for their own gas and truck maintenance. Lofty Lawn provides all the mowers, leaf blowers, and other landscaping equipment.

Workers are required to call in for a list of their day-to-day assignments, drive to the properties, perform the necessary work, call for the next job assignment, etc. They are expected to be “on call” (available) from 8 AM-4 PM, Monday through Friday. While working, they must wear the official “Lofty Lawns” T-shirt (summer) or sweatshirt (winter). Workers are paid a flat fee per property serviced, based on the amount of work and time necessary to complete the job. They must pay their own expenses to travel from one property to another, but they are guaranteed that jobs will not be more than 10 miles apart. They are not paid any benefits, such as health insurance, vacation or sick pay. Lofty Lawns does not deduct any withholding taxes (income taxes or payroll taxes) from their paychecks. Once each week, Larry visits the property where each worker is performing grounds work, monitors the work being done, and instructs the workers if he sees a need for improvement or a change in how they work the property. These weekly inspections can be on any day of the week so that the worker doesn’t know when to expect Larry. Based on his worksite monitoring and on customer satisfaction or dissatisfaction, Larry adjusts the rate of compensation for each worker twice each year. Almost all of Larry’s workers work for him on a 40+ hour week basis and do not work for any other landscaping company.

Recently, Will Worker was driving from one customer’s property to the next customer, ran a red light, and accidentally struck the car being driven by Sarah Senior, injuring her and damaging her car. Unfortunately, Will had just missed his last auto insurance premium payment, so his insurance company denied coverage. Sarah wants to pursue Larry’s business, “Lofty Lawns” for her damages. What is Sarah’s theory? Will she succeed?

 

HRM 320 DeVry Week 1 Discussion 2

TLC Pet Care (graded)

(TCO 9) TLC Pet Care Centers, a franchise operation of pet care clinics with boarding, has 56 full-time and 28 part-time employees at 13 locations. Employees include licensed veterinarians, veterinary assistants, animal groomers and front desk help. Many of the part-time employees are high school and college students who help with animals being boarded, by walking dogs, cleaning cages and helping with check-in and check-out. The management of TLC Pet Care Centers wants to establish uniform standards for these part-timers. To ensure that applicants have a real interest in working with animals, a “veterinary aptitude test” is being proposed, which would require applicants to identify various cat and dog breeds from a picture chart and name body parts of dogs and cats with proper veterinary terms. Another proposal is that each high school or college student who applies show a grade of “B” or higher in high school or college biology.

Management also wants to insist that part-timers show they’ve resided at the same address for at least 6 months, as of way of avoiding hiring “transient” student labor. Management also wants all applicants (full and part-time) to pass a “psychological screening” test to insure they do not have violent tempers or anger control problems that would create a risk of an animal being abused. Management is looking for a test to use for this. In the event an employee is ever suspected of abusing an animal, TLC’s current policy is that the employee will be required to submit to a polygraph test (lie detector test) regarding the alleged incident. Every employee must pass a drug screening test prior to being employed, in order to insure a drug-free workplace. This fact is prominently stated on the top of TLC’s employment application form. In addition, the employee handbook at TLC states that any employee reporting for work whose conduct causes the manager on duty to suspect drug use (including alcohol intoxication) is grounds for that employee to submit to blood or urine testing. Refusal under that circumstance is grounds for termination.

Are these policies at TLC Pet Care Centers in compliance with the law? If not, why not?

 

HRM 320 DeVry Week 2 Discussion 1

Theft of Time on the Internet (graded)

The internet is a staple of the modern office. Some companies are concerned that the Internet (and its e-mail application) lead to increased theft of time in the workplace. But, others argue that the Internet promotes efficiency of information. What are your thoughts on this? What are the parameters and the potential implications for failure to adhere to those parameters?

 

HRM 320 DeVry Week 2 Discussion 2

Elliptical – At Will (graded)

Human Resource Dilemma Number 5 (pg. 141, Moran text) says this:

In Elliptical Electronics Company’s employment handbook, it states in bold, “Employment is at will and can be terminated by either employer or employee at anytime for any reason with or without cause.” Later in the handbook, a multiple-step grievance procedure is outlined. Thomas Walker physically assaults a coworker without provocation. The co-worker is hospitalized, and Thomas is discharged immediately under the at-will policy. Thomas, who is black, reports that Elliptical violated its employment handbook by not providing him with a hearing as outlined in its grievance procedure. How would you advise Elliptical?

Do you think the grievance procedure modified Mr. Walker’s at-will employment relationship with Elliptical? When it comes to making such a determination, what factors come into play and are all factors consistent?

 

HRM 320 DeVry Week 3 Discussion 1

Young & Rich (graded)

Young & Rich, Inc. is a retail clothing chain that markets to the higher end of the young adult market, with a “look” that’s intended as a crossover between “prep school” and “active adventurous.” Image is very important to Young & Rich (Y&R), and a great deal of money and attention has been spent over the years marketing Y&R’s distinctive image. For sales associates in its retail operations, the company seeks young adults (ages 16-early 30s) who are “good looking,” “clean cut” and have the “All-American-boy-or-girl-next-door” look. The company claims that this is driven by “business necessity,” in that Y&R’s customers are drawn to stores where the staff have the “look” they’ve come to associate with Y&R. The company will not hire anyone with a drug conviction or who is currently in drug rehab. Y&R also will not hire anyone who is a member of the Communist party.

The company advertises its retail sales associate positions widely and hires from all racial and ethnic groups, men and women. Virtually all of the sales associates at Y&R have “the Y&R look.” Of those who applied for available positions last year, 45% of white applicants were hired, 37% of African American applicants were hired, 40% of Hispanic applicants were hired, 100% of Native American applicants were hired (only two applied), and 49% of Asian applicants were hired. Though Y&R hires more women than men for its retail sales operation, the percentage of applicants hired is approximately the same for men and women. In looking at the composition of the retail store staff, however, it’s apparent that virtually all of the African American sales associates are light-skinned.

Desmonda, a dark-skinned African American, was denied a sales associate position at Y&R despite having retail sales background. Caroline, a Hispanic woman, was told she did not have “the look we are looking for” when she applied for a sales associate position. Chelsea, a white woman who spent 6 months in drug rehab last year was rejected for a job at Y&R. Ted, a white university student who is a member of the Communist Party, was denied employment with Y&R for that reason.

About 25% of those hired as retail associates at Y&R were encouraged to apply when approached by a Y&R representative. Traci is one such employee. She was with friends at the local mall one day (where there is also a Y&R store) and was approached, in the food court by a Y&R manager who encouraged her to apply for a sales associate position that had just opened up at the Y&R store. Traci buys Y&R clothing and likes “the look,” so she applied for the position that day and was hired. This same system is used to hire sales associates from all races and ethnic groups, men and women. Is there a problem with this hiring practice? Why or why not?

 

HRM 320 DeVry Week 3 Discussion 2

Rx Medical Supply (graded)

Rx Medical Supply (Rx), a company with just over 500 employees adopted a written Affirmative Action plan in the early 1990s. At that time, the company’s professional, managerial, and executive positions were held, overwhelmingly, by white males. White females constituted the bulk of the front office and clerical staff. Rx’s Affirmative Action plan was adopted voluntarily (not as the result of a court order). Under the plan, qualified women and minorities were strongly urged to apply for the company’s available positions, especially professional, managerial and executive positions. Since that time, a large number of women and minorities were hired for these positions. Rx’s approach was (and still is) to review the credentials of all applicants, and identify all those who meet the “base” standard of “qualified” for the position. At that point, the company separates the “white male” applicant pool from the “women and minorities” pool, and identifies the top candidate(s) in each pool. If there is only one position available, it is awarded to the “most qualified” candidate overall. When there are two openings available for the same position, one position is filled with the top candidate from the “white male” pool, the other with the top candidate from the “women and minorities” pool. If there are 3 openings available for the same position, they are filled by selecting the “most qualified” applicant in the “white male” pool, the most qualified woman in the “women and minorities pool” and the most qualified racial minority in the “women and minorities pool.” If there are more than 3 openings for the same position, this same approach is applied ad infinitum.

As a result of its Affirmative Action plan, Rx has substantially increased the number of women and minorities in its professional, managerial, and executive ranks. Women now hold 45% of these positions. African Americans hold 18% of these positions, and Hispanics hold 13%. Rx’s Affirmative Action plan has come under attack as of late for being both “no longer necessary” and “discriminatory.” Jason, a white male, was rejected for a top technical position at Rx even though his credentials and experience exceeded that of Jennifer, the top candidate from the “women and minorities” pool who was one of two people hired for the position (there were two openings). There is no dispute that both Jason and Jennifer had the base qualifications for the position.

Is Rx Medical Supply’s Affirmative Action plan legally valid? Why or why not?

 

HRM 320 DeVry Week 4 Discussion 1

Boys Behaving Badly (graded)

The “All Erection” Crane Company has been in business for many years. The company sells and leases cranes and other heavy industrial equipment. Most of the sales force is male, and most of the office help is female. There is a lot of humor associated with the company’s name. The salesmen’s business cards and office stationary feature the picture of a crane with the company name “All Erection,” and the slogan, “All Erection, All the Time.” The President of the Company, Pete Sakes, spends very little time at the company’s facility, spending most of his time on the road developing business and buying equipment. Pete claims he had no knowledge of the incidents described below, except as noted.

 

HRM 320 DeVry Week 4 Discussion 2

The Pregnant Professor (graded)

Abagail Adams was hired as an associate professor of economics at Heartland University. She was the first woman professor hired in the department. When she was hired, she was given the same three-year time period as all other associate professors at Heartland U. to establish herself as an academic through teaching ability, publishing multiple articles in peer-reviewed journals, and developing a rapport with colleagues in the department through committee participation and attendance at professional conferences. After three years, as was the custom, she would face a tenure vote, and would either receive tenure and be promoted to full professor, or be denied tenure and given one year to locate another position.

 

HRM 320 DeVry Week 5 Discussion 1

Case Court Reporting (graded)

Case Court Reporting is a private court reporting company, which provides certified court reporters to law firms to take testimony in depositions and arbitration hearings, as well as providing “closed captioning” to local television stations for their community-based programming. Case Court Reporting (CCR) has 37 employees.

One of CCR’s court reporters is Hanna Holy, a devout Christian who will not use everyday swear words because of her religious belief, they take God’s name in vain. Hanna is a fast and accurate court reporter, but if a witness or lawyer uses swear words in any deposition or hearing she is reporting, she omits the offensive words. For example, when a witness said, “Hell, no, I don’t give a damn what he does,” Hanna typed, “Heck no, I don’t give a darn what he does.” When the law firm that ordered the transcript objected, Hanna’s “correction” was “H—, no, I don’t give a d—- what he does.” The law firm complained again, and the transcript had to be revised again (to state the original testimony) by another court reporter in the office who did not have Hanna’s sensibilities.

The office manager at CCR is Dale Dabbler, who recently proclaimed her conversion to Wicca-ism. In connection with her worship of several deities associated with her new beliefs, she believes she should be entitled to burn a candle in her office every afternoon, and carry a picture of one of the deities on her at all times, on a necklace that dangles from her neck. CCR does not believe it should be required to accommodate either Hanna or Dale’s religious practices on the job.

Due to a decline in the court reporting industry, CCR believes it must lay off about 10 of its court reporters. If layoffs are based on seniority, most of the youngest court reporters will be laid off. If the layoffs are based on skill level, which in court reporting is measured by the speed and accuracy at which someone can transcribe, most of the layoffs will be among CCR’s oldest employees, those aged 45 or older. One possible solution CCR is considering is offering an “early retirement package” to all employees aged 50 or older, under which they would receive a generous cash incentive to take retirement. For those not sufficiently induced, the company would require that they be transferred to in-office transcription of other court reporter’s notes, rather than continuing to be sent out to law firms for depositions and arbitration hearings.

Mary Sunshine, age 59, was dismissed last year as a court reporter for CCR, at a time when she was earning the highest pay and benefits of any reporter in the company. She was not given a reason for her dismissal, and was replaced by Ginny Fox, age 41, who was paid substantially less. After Mary made a complaint with the EEOC over her dismissal, CCR discovered that during her tenure as an employee, Mary had stolen office supplies valued at several hundred dollars.

As the HR director at CCR, what problems can you identify?

 

HRM 320 DeVry Week 5 Discussion 2

All American Gear (graded)

All American Gear, Inc. makes American flags. It has just under 50 employees. It is proud of its tradition of making its product only in the U.S., and with American workers. All American Gear (AAG) hires people of all ancestries, but requires that all its employees be U.S. citizens. Pedro, an immigrant from Costa Rica, who holds a resident alien card (showing he is in the U.S. legally) applied for a position at AAG for which he was otherwise qualified, and was turned down based on lack of U.S. citizenship.

Two employees of AAG, Rajid, a first generation American of Pakistani ancestry, and Sonja, a first generation American of Serb-Bosnian ancestry complained that two co-workers of Mexican ancestry made abusive, derogatory remarks about them in Spanish. There was some dispute about what was said, since everyone else who overheard the exchange speaks little or no Spanish. As a result, AAG adopted an “English only” policy at the workplace. Juan and Garcia, the alleged harassers, complained that the English-language-only rule discriminated against them because of their national origin.

Bernie is the national sales manager for AAG. His job duties include giving sales presentations to large groups. Several months ago, he was severely injured in a motorcycle accident, resulting in permanent hearing loss and a broken arm. The broken arm now requires months of physical therapy. Bernie wants AAG to hire an assistant for him to hear questions in the back of the room at sales presentations, and special equipment to type his reports.

There is a job opening at AAG for a sewing machine operator. This position requires someone who can operate and maintain the large industrial sewing machines that the company uses for stitching large cloth flags. The sewing machine itself has an emergency stop pedal on floor level, as well as other levers at 2′, 3 1/2′ and 5 1/2′ off the floor. It also requires someone who can set, reset, and un-jam large pieces of fabric from the sewing mechanism, which requires upper body strength, mobility, and flexibility. Dana, a paraplegic with sewing experience, has applied for the job.

Recently, after a wave of rumors began to cause complaints and absenteeism, two AAG employees disclosed certain medical conditions. Trace admitted that he is HIV positive and is taking a cocktail of drugs to combat his condition. Farah admitted that he is suffering from an attack of West Nile virus. Other AAG employees are refusing to work with or near either Trace or Farah and state that they will quit if they are required to do so.

What laws, if any, apply to these HR issues at AAG?

 

HRM 320 DeVry Week 6 Discussion 1

Upsides and Downsides (graded)

Our readings focused on the benefits of unionizing and collective bargaining. Let’s examine the opposing point of view. Many people feel that unions and collective bargaining actually have a heavy downside that is sometimes ignored. Do you think there is a downside or disadvantage to having unions or engaging in collective bargaining? Explain your responses and support your positions.

Some other world factors that must be considered in any discussion of this issue are outsourcing and third world labor markets. Explain how outsourcing and third world labor markets enter into the mix when it comes to unionizing and collective bargaining. How has the recent economic downturn impacted your position on these issues?

 

HRM 320 DeVry Week 6 Discussion 2

Express Delivery Systems (graded)

Express Delivery Systems, Inc. is a worldwide package delivery company that specializes in fulfilling “just in time” parts and supplies to manufacturers. It provides both “overnight” and “express” deliveries, express referring to the fastest road-based delivery available 24/7. Express Delivery Systems (EDS) drivers and sorters work in 3 overlapping 8-hour shifts, M-F, so that the necessary personnel are always available to make a shipment. Therefore, some employees work7:00 AM to 3:30 PM (with a half-hour lunch break), some work10:00 AM-6:30 PM, some work11:00 PM-7:30 AM, and so on. There are also two part-time “weekend” shifts, with 12-hour days Saturday and Sunday. EDS pays its full-time employees based on a 40-hour work week, M-F. These employees can then earn “overtime” pay on weekends by filling in when needed if delivery demands require supplementing the part-time “weekend” crew.

When full-timers work on the weekend, however, they agree to be “on call” in 4-hour increments. To do this, they “call in” their availability and the 4-hour “clock” begins. During that 4 hours, the employee must be reachable at all times via cell phone, and must be able to take a delivery immediately. The employee may not travel outside his or her “pick up zone” while on call, which limits mobility to approx. a 12-mile radius. If the employee gets a delivery request, he/she makes the delivery and is paid for both the “wait time” and the time taken to make the actual delivery. If the employee gets no call within the 4 hours, he/she is not paid, but can sign up for another 4-hour “on call” status at any time. No regular employee is ever required to be on call weekends; the company relies on “go getters” who want to make some OT on the weekend and are willing to be available for it.

Dennis, a full-time M-F employee, agreed to go “on call” weekends many times last year, and spent a total of 600 “overtime” hours “on call,” though he was only called and paid for deliveries for 150 hours. He insists that he is owed overtime pay for the remaining 450 hours. During school holiday periods, EDS also hires high school students (aged 14 and older) to assist in processing orders at its two national distribution centers. EDS does not allow the students to work more than 6 hours per day or more than 36 hours per week, and they may not work with the mechanical sorting equipment. The students are paid minimum wage, and the job is advertised as a “paid internship.” The local high school complains that students who work at EDS over school holidays are returning exhausted, and that no one under age 16 should be permitted to work there.

Renee, a scheduling manager for EDS, worked an average of 50 hours per week last year. She is paid a salary of $50,000 plus full benefits to manage the scheduling of sorters and drivers for incoming orders. She supervises a staff of 8 scheduling assistants, who each coordinate schedules within their geographic regions. She is actively involved in hiring, training and supervising these scheduling assistants, but does not have the sole power to hire or fire them. She is claiming overtime for the excess hours worked, and EDS is claiming she is part of “management” and is exempt from being paid overtime.

What issues do you see raised by this scenario?

 

HRM 320 DeVry Week 7 Discussion 1

Defined Benefit or Contribution Plans (graded)

Congress passed the Employment Retirement Income Security Act to protect employee benefits including pension or retirement benefits. However, ERISA does not specifically address one of the current “hot topics” in employer retirement plans. That “hot topic” is the use of defined benefit or defined contribution retirement plans. Employers that have defined benefit retirement plans are increasingly converting those plans to defined contribution plans while almost all new employee pension plans are defined contribution plans. What protections does ERISA provide to employees in general? How might these protections be inadequate from an employee standpoint as our country faces challenging economic times? Can employees truly “rely” on benefits such as health insurance and retirement?

 

HRM 320 DeVry Week 7 Discussion 2

Ergonomics Requirements (graded)

Compliance Publications (CP) has 2000 employees. Approximately 200 of those employees spend their 8 workday hours typing and transcribing materials for the various publications produced at Compliance. Many of these employees work in a large typing hall (an open location where each employee has a small desk and a computer where they complete their typing). Some employees, however, work from remotely from home during the same work hours, and are responsible for providing their own workspace. Recently, the employees have been complaining about pain in their back and wrists, eye strain, and discomfort on standing after the long day of typing. Individual employees have made the following suggestions.

Margaret, who works in the typing hall, asks for swivel typing chairs equiped with a high-back, lumbar (low-back) support, and foot rests.

Jung, who works in the typing hall, asks for the computer keyboards to be replaced by ergonomic keyboards.

Angel, who works in the typing hall, asks for computer monitor screen guards to reduce the glare coming from the existing computer monitors.

Kepi, who works in the typing hall, asks for current computer monitors to be replaced with large screen anti-glare plasma monitors mounted on ergonomic bracketing for the correct angle and positioning of the display.

Frank, who works in the typing hall, asks for CP to hire a trainer to come in and work individually with typists on ergonomic positioning.

Lavone, who works in the typing hall, objects to any changes to his workstation and wants CP to agree that any changes it makes will not apply to his workstation.

Roseanne, who is an Executive Assistant, has her own office, and spends less than 1/4 of her work day typing, asks that CP provide her with the same ergonomic equipment and training that it provides to its workers in the typing hall.

Destiny, who works from home, asks that CP provide her with the same ergonomic equipment and training that it provides to its workers in the typing hall.

Eileen, who works in HR, collects the suggestions and is asked to make a recommendation to CP about how to proceed. Considering OSHA’s current stance on ergonomics, what should she recommend?

 

HRM 320 DeVry Week 2 Assignment Latest

Details:

Please answer the following questions in an MS Word document using APA style formatting. For those which you need research to answer, please provide the citations.

  1. What do you think are some of the factors in the modern workplace that contribute to a theft of time? How can those factors be managed?
  2. What does the word Whistleblower mean (legally speaking)? Give an example of whistleblowing.
  3. “Retaliation” has become one of the most often cited reasons for employees filing charges with the EEOC against their employers. Please define “retaliation” in the legal, employment sense – and explain when it is illegal. What can an employee do when they feel they have been retaliated against and for what reasons does retaliation rise to the level of an EEOC lawsuit?
  4. During the course of a day, employee Jennifer Anniestown (an accountant) constantly opens and updates her Facebook account on her iPad, checks on her lottery ticket numbers, calls and talks to her mother for 30 minutes, her children for 10 minutes (she makes sure they get home safely every day) and her husband every afternoon for 15 minutes to see if he or she is making dinner that night. Her employer, Billybob Thornblower listens to each of her phone calls to make sure that she isn’t talking to his wife, one of her good friends, about his actions at work. (He is always hitting on the salesgirls, in a good-natured way.) Billybob ends up being fired for sexual harassment when one of the salesgirls complains. Jennifer’s new boss, Tracy, notices that Jennifer is doing a ton of personal work during company time. There is no written policy about this issue at the company. To date, Jennifer’s work is exemplary. She always has everything done in a timely manner and her books balance at the end of every day. What should Tracy do about this situation?
  5. Last month, Steven Smith was hired as the secretary for lawyer Wayne Wright, who has a drinking problem. Wayne’s last secretary quit when Wayne tried to get her to go out with him on a date. So far, Steven and Wayne have gotten along peachy. Steven is subpoenaed to testify in the harassment lawsuit of Wayne’s former secretary, and says (under oath) that Wayne has treated him great, but that Wayne also admitted he had asked the secretary out on dates regularly and grabbed her inappropriately. Steven is telling the truth. A few weeks later, Wayne and his firm lose the harassment case and have to pay the prior secretary back pay and reinstate her to her job as part of the damages in the case. The firm terminates Steven so that they can put the old secretary back in her job. Steven asks you what you think he should do. What do you say?

Submit your assignment to the Dropbox, located at the top of this page. For instructions on how to use the Dropbox, read these.equella.ecollege.com/file/8ff9f27a-3772-48cf-9855-4bec4e6706bf/1/Dropbox.html”>step-by-step instructions.

See the Syllabus section “Due Dates for Assignments & Exams” for due date information.

 

 

HRM 320 DeVry Week 3 Assignment Latest

Details:

  1. Define BFOQ and list to which characteristics it applies
  2. What is USERRA? How does USERRA protect those on military leave?
  3. What are the requirements of an Affirmative Action plan? List the criteria for proof of its “remedial nature.”
  4. Answer Human Resource Dilemma, Ch. 7 #5, p.187 (Emmanuel Abrams)
  5. Answer Human Resource Dilemma, Ch. 9 #4, p.237 (Sun Loo Chan)

Use APA formatting for your assignment and any citations you use.

Submit your assignment to the Dropbox, located at the top of this page. For instructions on how to use the Dropbox, read these.equella.ecollege.com/file/8ff9f27a-3772-48cf-9855-4bec4e6706bf/1/Dropbox.html”>step-by-step instructions.

See the Syllabus section “Due Dates for Assignments & Exams” for due date information.

 

HRM 320 DeVry Week 5 Assignment Latest

Details:

Please answer the following questions in an MS Word document using APA style formatting. Cite your sources.

  1. When can an employee’s religious belief qualify as a bona fide occupational qualification?
  2. Answer Human Resource Dilemma, Ch 14, #1, p. 355. (Milton, Madden & Herman)
  3. Answer Human Recourse Dilemma, Ch 15, #3, p. 374. (Johnny Carlton)
  4. Answer Human Resource Dilemma, Ch 16, #2, p. 394. (Harvey Jameson)
  5. Answer Human Resource Dilemma, Ch 17, #3, p. 417. (Rita Hall)

 

 

HRM 320 DeVry Week 6 Assignment Latest

Discrimination Research Paper

Details:

Introduction

Your course project for this term is to write a 6-8 page, double-spaced mini-research paper, with your subject as Employment Discrimination. Everything you need to know about the project resides on this tab.

Your project requires at least three (3) outside resources besides the textbook. Your paper must be written in APA format, include a title and reference page, and reference your sources both internally (parenthetically) and in the reference page. Please use the APA template in doc-sharing to complete your work.

Employment discrimination law is about prohibiting or encouraging behaviors in the workplace regarding differences in people. It has evolved over the years significantly, and the passage of Title VII, the US. Civil Rights Act, has made more changes to how the US defines the right to work free from harassment and discrimination, than any other law, case, or regulation in the nation. This project has three parts. Part 1 asks you to answer eight questions about employment discrimination. Part 2 asks you to pick one US Supreme court case from a list, to discuss. Part 3 asks you to review pending legislation regarding employment discrimination, and provide a few details about one currently pending (i.e. not yet passed) bill in either your state, or the federal government. Remember, the focus of the project is on employment discrimination.

Project Part 1:

Answer each of the following 8 questions, in 1-2 paragraphs each. You can use your textbook, or other outside sources to answer these questions. Do not write a book – answer the questions succinctly.

  1. What must a person who is claiming they were harassed in the workplace allege in order to first state a case with the EEOC for each of the following types of harassment:
  2. Sexual harassment – quid pro quo
  3. Sexual harassment – hostile environment
  4. Religious harassment
  5. Racial harassment
  6. Explain the difference between sexual harassment, gender discrimination, and sexual orientation discrimination, as those terms are used legally.
  7. How does GINA protect a person whose mother died of breast cancer from employment discrimination?
  8. Provide one example of a behavior that could be found to be both a hostile environment and quid pro quo forms of sexual harassment at the same time. Explain how a person could argue that this behavior at work was illegal.
  9. Give the main legal reason why every company should have a valid written policy against all forms of harassment (besides the fact it is the “right” thing to do.)
  10. Can an employer require that only females serve female customers and only males serve male customers? Explain your answer using legal terms.
  11. How many employees must an employer or company have working for it to be subject to:
  12. the ADA
  13. Pregnancy Discrimination Act
  14. Title VII
  15. IRCA
  16. GINA
  17. Assume you work for a company that has a sexual anti-harassment policy, but not a religious, sexual orientation, or racial anti-harassment policy. Write a one-two paragraph statement to your boss (the HR Director), as to why you believe it would make sense to revamp the policy to include other forms of harassment. Include one example of a real situation where a policy may have protected a company from liability or stopped harassment from happening. (You will find case examples on the EEOC website). Cite that case/situation in your memo to your boss. Provide the amount of damages/fines the company in your example case had to pay as a result of failing to protect an employee from discrimination.

Project Part 2:

Employment Discrimination Cases

Many court cases on employment discrimination have shaped, created, and changed the employment landscape. Some protect employees from discrimination, and many protect employers from liability. Settlements and trial court cases do not create legal precedent or changes in the law. However, appeals court cases, and especially the U.S. Supreme Court Cases, do change, shape, and create new law, when statutes are interpreted in binding ways. Pick ONE case from the following list.

Read the case. Answer each of the FOUR questions following the list of cases and place them in your Project Part II. Be sure to identify WHICH of the cases you selected.

List of U.S. Supreme Court Cases:

Vance v. Ball State University. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/11-556_11o2.pdf

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-484_o759.pdf

Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp. 400 U.S. 542 (1971). http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=400&invol=542

Espinoza v Farah Mfg. Co, 414 U.S. 86 (1973) http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=414&invol=86

Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, 83 F. 3d 118 http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/96-568.ZO.html

Questions for answer.

  1. Explain briefly, the statute(s) (law or act) which was in question in your case, the facts of the case, and why the parties were in court. What was each party asking the court to do?
  2. What did the court decide in your case and what will be the results of that decision? (i.e. who won, and was the winfinalor did the court send the case back to the lower court system to re-decide an issue?)
  3. In what way did this case create, change, or shape the employment landscape for employers as a result of the decision made? Did this change help employers or employees the most? Explain.
  4. Do you agree with the decision in the case you referenced? In other words, do you think that employment law was made better and stronger, or weaker and less effective as a result of this case? Write at least one full paragraph that supports your opinion.

Part 3.

Legal Research into an Employment Law Pending before Congress

Organizations such as the Society for Human Resource Management (http://www.shrm.org) each year, thousands of proposed laws are being discussed, debated, and either passed, ignored, or rejected in state legislators around the country, or in Congress.

Find a proposed piece of legislation in the U.S. (or your state legislature) which interests you. This piece of legislation needs to regard employment law in some way (labor law, employment discrimination, ADA, PPACA, Title VII, GINA, etc.) Note that any bill that suggests changes to any current law will suffice, as well as a new law. Some examples you can use if you are interested are: the Fair Playing Field Act of 2012, the Religious Freedom Act of 2012,or a new bill regarding whether full-time employment under PPACA is 40 hours/week instead of 30 hours. (Since the time of writing this project, it is possible these examples of passed – be sure to check if you use any of them).

Places to look for legislation like this include:

Congress.gov. http://www.congress.gov

(Note that the Active Legislation link (right side) and Most Viewed Bills side include unpassed, pending legislation. the Public Laws link are passed laws – so do not use those.)

Govtrack.US https://www.govtrack.us/

Note: you can type in your state, and get updates your state’s representatives to Congress.

SHRM’s legislative pages:

http://www.shrm.org/legalissues/federalresources/federallegislation/pages/default.aspx#

(Note that link takes you to the top level – and you can dig around on their links to find more information. Some of the internal pages may require a subscription to SHRM, however.)

Once you find a law pending before Congress that interests you, read the bill and answer these questions.

  1. What is the name of the bill? What is the resolution number of the bill (e.g., HR 212)?
  2. Does the bill you selected create a new law or amend an existing law?
  3. If this bill is passed, how will it change current employment law? Be specific here and include enough detail so that someone reading your answer really understanding the bill under consideration.
  4. State whether you agree or disagree with the bill. If you were a member of Congress would you vote for it? Explain why. This section of your paper should be about 1 to 2 pages.

 

 

HRM 320 DeVry Week 4 Quiz Latest

Question 1. Question: TCO 1: Which of the following is not a duty of an employee to his or her employer?

  • Duty of Loyalty.
  • Duty to Act in Good Faith.
  • Duty to Account.
  • Duty to Compensate.

Question 2. Question: TCO 1: An agreement not to go to work for your employer’s competitor is called a:

  • Non-compete Agreement.
  • Unemployment Agreement.
  • Collective Bargaining Agreement.
  • Planned Agreement.

Question 3. Question: TCO 1: The number of states that have adopted the Model Employment Termination Act is:

  • All 50.
  • 33.
  • 1.
  • Zero.

Question 4. Question: TCO 1: In determining whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor, which of the following factors would a court consider?

  • Training.
  • Control over the time and the manner of doing the work.
  • Payment of business expenses and providing of tools.
  • All of the above.

Question 5. Question: TCO 1: John comes into the school’s office and sees Betty at the front desk. She’s the receptionist, but John doesn’t know what her job is. John asks Betty if she can register him for classes and provide some financial aid information. Betty says, “sure,” though Betty is not authorized to do these things. Betty registers John for the classes he requests & hands him a financial aid package. What type of authority does Betty display?

  • actual authority
  • apparent authority
  • implied authority
  • expert authority

Question 6. Question: TCO 9: John’s employer has a reasonable suspicion that John has been involved in a theft of several thousand dollars’ worth of tools. As part of the investigation, John undergoes a polygraph test and is asked a series of questions. Which of the following questions would be prohibited by the EPPA?

  • Questions about John’s use of prescription drugs.
  • Questions about John’s performance of his job duties.
  • Questions about inaccuracies on John’s employment application.
  • Questions about John’s whereabouts at the time the tools went missing.

Question 7. Question: TCO 9: An employer’s ability to subject an employee to a polygraph test is limited by what law?

  • The Employer Polygraph Act.
  • The Employee Polygraph Protection Act.
  • Title VII.
  • FMLA.

Question 8. Question: TCO 4: Which law requires employers to obtain permission before hiring a third party to conduct a back ground check of an applicant?

  • Fair Credit Reporting Act.
  • Title VII.
  • Fair Employment Act.
  • Equal Pay Act.

Question 9. Question: TCO 4: When an employee’s work environment becomes so intolerable that the employee has no choice but to resign, the employee’s job loss is referred to as:

  • Constructive discharge.
  • Retaliation.
  • Wrongful firing.
  • Hostile discharge.

Question 10. Question: TCO 4: Employees of the federal government have their privacy rights protected by the:

  • Privacy Act of 1974.
  • Title VII.
  • State law.
  • Federal Employees Act.

 

 

HRM 320 DeVry Final Exam Latest

Page 1

Question 1. 1. TCO 1: Bob hires Johnny to sell newspapers. Bob tells Johnny to sell the newspapers for $1.00 each. Bob has given Johnny what type of authority: (Points : 5)

  • Implied Authority.
  • Apparent Authority.
  • Disciplinary Authority.
  • Express Authority.

Question 2. 2. TCO 1: The SILK factors assist in determining whether a person is: (Points : 5)

  • an employee or an employer
  • taxed using the alternative minimum tax formula
  • an employee or an individual contractor
  • wearing proper business casual clothing.

Question 3. 3. TCO 1: Which of the following is a duty of an employer to his or her employee? (Points : 5)

  • Duty of Trustworthiness.
  • Duty to Provide good food in the cafeteria.
  • Duty to Account.
  • Duty to Compensate.

Question 4. 4. TCO 2 & 3: The Family and Medical Leave Act requires employers to provide employees with: (Points : 5)

  • 12 weeks of paid leave.
  • 12 weeks of unpaid leave.
  • 24 weeks of paid leave.
  • 24 weeks of unpaid leave.

Question 5. 5. TCO 2 & 3. Julia Rissotti was hired as an X-Ray tech by Biomedical Clinic Services, Inc. Her job as X-Ray tech subjects her to repeated exposure to radiation, and she is required to keep track of the exposure to ensure she is not over-exposed. Julia gets pregnant and her boss is concerned that the repeat exposure could be bad for the baby. Her boss offers to move Julia to another department during her pregnancy and assures her that her pay and seniority will not be impacted, and Julia refuses to move. Her boss insists, and forces Julia to move to the receptionist position (same pay, benefits) and gives her an additional week of vacation to sweeten the situation. Julia has been: (Points : 5)

  • Given a great deal and should be happy she has such a great boss. She can’t sue for any grounds.
  • Treated like any other employee with a need for an accommodation due to a temporary disability.
  • Legally accommodated for a disability.
  • Illegally discriminated against under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act.
  • Illegally discriminated against under Title VII, sex based classification discrimination.

Question 6. 6. TCO 2 & 3: The bona fide occupational qualification defense (BFOQ) operates as a defense to discrimination suits based on religion, national origin, gender and: (Points : 5)

  • race.
  • color.
  • age.
  • sexual orientation.

Question 7. 7. TCOs 2 & 3: Sexual harassment encompasses which of the following types of conduct? (Points: 5)

  • Requests for sexual favors.
  • Distribution of material of a sexual nature.
  • Comments or jokes of a sexual nature.
  • All of the above can be considered sexual harassment.

Question 8. 8. TCO 2 & 3: The ADEA prohibits discrimination against employee and applicants for employment who are age: (Points : 5)

  • 35 and older.
  • 40 and older.
  • 50 and older.
  • 60 older.

Question 9. 9. TCOs 2 & 3: Title VII’s prohibition against discrimination on the basis of race makes unlawful discrimination against which of the following groups? (Points : 5)

  • African-Americans and Asians.
  • African-Americans, Hispanics and Asians.
  • African-Americans, Hispanics, Asians and American Indians.
  • African-Americans, Hispanics, Asians, American Indians and Caucasians.

Question 10. 10. TCO 2 & 3: The Americans with Disabilities Act applies to employers who employ: (Points : 5)

  • 10 or more employees.
  • 15 or more employees.
  • 20 or more employees.
  • 25 or more employees.

Question 11. 11. TCO 2 & 3: Discrimination on the basis of national origin is prohibited by: (Points : 5)

  • Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
  • Immigration Control and Reform Act.
  • The Unauthorized Aliens Act.
  • None of the above.

Question 12. 12. TCO 4: Which law requires employers to obtain permission before hiring a third party to conduct a back ground check of an applicant? (Points : 5)

  • Fair Credit Reporting Act.
  • Title VII.
  • Fair Employment Act.
  • Equal Pay Act.

Question 13. 13. TCO 4: Employees of private companies have their privacy rights protected by: (Points : 5)

  • The Privacy Act of 1974.
  • Title VII.
  • Fair Employment Practices Act.
  • Federal Employees Act.
  • None of the above.

Question 14. 14. TCO 5: The Norris-LaGuardia Act provided for each of the following except: (Points : 5)

  • injunctions could not be used to prohibit any person from participating in a labor dispute.
  • labor unions could provide relief funds to strikers.
  • yellow dog contracts were directly outlawed.
  • collective bargaining was endorsed as a matter of public policy.

Question 15. 15. TCO 5: The Employees Association Labor Union believes that ACME Co. has engaged in unfair labor practices and should file a complaint with: (Points : 5)

  • NLRB.
  • EEOC.
  • DOL.
  • OSHA.

Question 16. 16. TCO 6: If OSHA decides to impose fines or penalties against an employer, that employer may appeal to: (Points : 5)

  • the president.
  • Congress.
  • the courts.
  • NIOSH.

Question 17. 17. TCO 6: In order to protect employees who may be injured on the job, most states require employers to maintain: (Points : 5)

  • General liability insurance.
  • Pension insurance.
  • Safety insurance.
  • Workers compensation insurance.

Question 18. 18. TCO 6: The research arm of OSHA is known as: (Points : 5)

  • ROSH.
  • FEDOSH.
  • NIOSH.
  • FBI.

Question 19. 19. TCO 7: Under FLSA, a child under the age of 14 may be allowed to work for which of the following with court approval? (Points : 5)

  • A nature preserve.
  • A manufacturing plant.
  • A professional soccer team.
  • A fast food restaurant.

Question 20. 20. TCO 7: The Equal Pay Act allows employers to pay different pay based on: (Points : 5)

  • merit
  • seniority
  • knowledge
  • all of the above

Question 21. 21. TCO 8: Each week I contribute a portion of my salary to my employer’s 401k plan and that contribution is matched by my employer. This type of retirement plan is referred to as a: (Points : 5)

  • defined benefit plan.
  • defined pension plan.
  • defined enrollment plan.
  • defined contribution plan.

Question 22. 22. TCO 9: The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 prohibits discrimination against: (Points : 5)

  • Illegal aliens.
  • US Citizens.
  • Legal Reformers.
  • Legal aliens.

Question 23. 23. TCO 9: The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 applies to employers with: (Points: 5)

  • 4 or more employees.
  • 5 or more employees.
  • 10 or more employees.
  • 15 or more employees.

Question 24. 24. TCO 9: Employment discrimination against individuals who are not United States citizens, but who have a resident alien card is prohibited by: (Points: 5)

  • Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
  • The Immigration Reform and Control Act.
  • The Resident Alien Act.
  • The Equal Opportunity Act.

Question 25. 25. TCO 4: What are the exceptions to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act that allow employers to intercept employees e-mail messages? (Points : 10)

Question 26. 26. TCO 5: Andreas is offered a new position, but is required by his employer to sign an agreement stating that he will not join a union or engage in union activity as a condition of employment. Andreas is not interested in joining a union and so he voluntarily signs the agreement. Is this legal? (Points : 10)

Question 27. 27. TCOs 7 and 8: What is the PBGC and what is its purpose? (Points : 10)

Question 28. 28. TCOs 2 and 3: Meredith Jones, age 42, was fired from her position as an administrative assistant. She was replaced a week later by a 25-year old. Meredith did nothing about her firing for 2 ½ years and then decided to sue for age discrimination. Will she be successful? Why or why not? (Points : 15)

Question 29. 29. TCOs 2 and 3: Our Lady of Good Council Catholic Church wants to hire a receptionist for its church office. It posts a position announcement in its weekly newsletter about the position, and notes that only Catholics need apply. Can Our Lady of Good Council Catholic Church refuse to hire someone because they are not of the Catholic faith? (Points : 15)

Question 30. 30. TCO 4: Eddie employee witnesses ACME Co. management dumping toxic waste into a stream near the ACME Co. facility. Eddie contacts the Environmental Protection Agency and reports what he saw. The EPA investigates and fines ACME Co. for the toxic release. ACME’s president terminates Eddie after learning that Eddie had report the release to the EPA. Could Eddie successfully sue ACME for wrongful discharge? If so, under what theory? (Points : 15)

Question 31. 31. TCO 7: Cecilia is a 14-year old freshman at United High School. She works from 2pm to 10pm three days a week. In order to get to work on time she leaves school early missing her last class. Her last class rotates each day so no one really notices. Is this permissible? Explain what law either allow or prohibits this behavior, and why. (Points : 15)

Question 32. 32. TCO 8: Who is a qualifying beneficiary under COBRA? (Points : 15)

Question 33. 33. TCO 9: Franklin Bercholtz applied for a position at the AMCE Bank. While waiting for an interview, Ms. Goldstein, an interviewee, made a negative comment about Germans while Franklin was waiting to be interviewed. Franklin was denied employment even though he was highly qualified for the position. Franklin was told he might have a case of nation origin discrimination. What is the 4-step test for national origin discrimination? (Points : 15)